Comparison and identification of attribute similarity based on genetic markers (2024)

Teo, et al., “Singapore Genome Variation Project: A haplotype map of three Southeast Asian populations” Genome Res. 19, (2009) pp. 2154-2162.
The International HapMap Consortium, “A haplotype map of the human genome” vol. 437, Oct. 27, 2005, pp. 1300-1320. doi:10.1038/nature04226.
The International HapMap Consortium, “A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs,” Nature, vol. 449, Oct. 18, 2007, pp. 851-860.

.
Thomas, Alun, Nicola J. Camp, James M. Farnham, Kristina Allen-Brady, and Lisa A Cannon-Albright, “Shared genomic segment analysis: Mapping disease predisposition genes in extended pedigrees using SNP genotype assays”, Annals of human genetics 72, No. 2 (2008): 279-287.
Thomas, et al., “Genomic mismatch scanning in pedigrees” IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine and Biology, vol. 11, (1994) pp. 1-16.
Thomas, et al., “Multilocus linkage analysis by blocked Gibbs sampling” Statistics and Computing, vol. 10, (2000), pp. 259-269.
Thompson, E.A., “Estimation of relationships from genetic data”, Handbook of statistics 8 (1991), pp. 255-269.
Thompson, E.A., “Inference of genealogical structure” Soc. Sci. Inform. 15, (1976) pp. 477-526.
Thompson, E.A., “The estimation of pairwise relationships” Ann. Hum. Genet., Lond. 39, (1975) pp. 173-188.
Thompson, et al., “The IBD process along four chromosomes,” Theor. Popul. Biol. May 73(3) May 2008, pp. 369-373.
Tishkoff, et al., “The Genetic Structure and History of Africans and African Americans,” Science, vol. 324(5930), May 22, 2009, pp. 1035-1044. doi:10.1126/science.1172257.
Todorov, et al., “Probabilities of identity-by-descent patterns in sibships when the parents are not genotyped” Genet. Epidemiol. 14 (1997) pp. 909-913.
Transcript of Proceedings dated Jun. 29, 2018, Case No. 18-cv-02791-JCS, Re Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, heard in the United States District Court in and for the Northern District of California LLC, in the matter of 23andMe, Inc. v. Ancestry.com DNA, LLC, Ancestry.com Operations Inc., and Ancestry.com.
Trial Investigators, et al., “DREAM (Diabetes Reduction Assessment with ramipril and rosilglitazone Medication)—Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trial,” Lancet 368, (2006) pp. 1096-1105.
Tu, et al., “The maximum of a function of a Markov chain and application to linkage analysis” Adv. Appl. Probab. 31, (1999) pp. 510-531.
Tuomilehto, J. et al., “Prevention of Type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance”, N. Engl. J. Med. 344:18, May 3, 2001, pp. 1343-1350.
Tzeng, et al., “Determination of sibship by PCR-amplified short tandem repeat analysis in Taiwan” Transfusion 40, (2000) pp. 840-845.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/895,236, filed Mar. 16, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/999,064, filed Oct. 10, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/999,065, filed Oct. 15, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/999,148, filed Oct. 10, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/999,175, filed Oct. 15, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/070,321, filed Mar. 19, 2008.
Valente E.M. et al., “Hereditary early-0nset Parkinson's disease caused by mutations in PINK1” Science 304 (2004), pp. 1158-1160.
Van De Casteele, et al., “A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators” Molecular Ecology 10, (2001) pp. 1539-1549.
Vrbsky, S.V. & Liu, J.W.S. “Approximate—A Query Processor That Produces Monotonically Improving Approximate Answers.” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 5, 1056-1068 (1993).
Wagner, S.F.,“Introduction to Statistics, Harper Collins Publishers”, 1992, pp. 23-30.
Wang, et al., “An estimator of pairwise relatedness using molecular markers” Genetics, vol. 160 (2002) pp. 1203-1215.
Wang, et al., “An integrated hidden Markov model designed for high-resolution copy number variation detection in whole-genome SNP genotyping data,” Genome Res. 17, 2007, pp. 665-1674.
Wannamethee, S.G. et al. “Metabolic syndrome vs Framingham Risk Score for prediction of coronary heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes mellitus”, Arch. Intern. Med. 2005;165, pp. 2644-2650.
Weir, et al., “Allelic association patterns for a dense SNP map” Genetic Epidemiology 24, (2004) pp. 442-450.
Weir, et al., “Behavior of pairs of loci in finite monoecious populations” Theor. Popul. Biol. 6 (1974) pp. 323-354.
Weir, et al., “Estimating F-statistics” Annual Review of Genetics, 36, (2002) pp. 721-750.
Weir, et al., “Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges” Nature Genetics 7, (2006) pp. 771-780.
Weir, et al., “Group inbreeding with two linked loci” Genetics 63 (1969) pp. 711-742.
Weir, et al., “Measures of human population structure show heterogeneity among genomic regions” Genome Res. 15 (2005) pp. 1468-1476. [PubMed:16251456].
Weiss, et al., “Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, No. 7, Feb. 14, 2008, pp. 667-675.
Whittemore, et al., “A Class of Tests for Linkage Using Affected Pedigree Members” Biometrics 50, (1994) pp. 118-127.
WHO Expert Consultation, “Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and Intervention strategies”, Lancet 363, (2004) pp. 157-163.
WHO International Association for the Study of Obesity, International Obesity Task Force, “The Asia-Pacific 29 perspective: Redefining Obesity and its Treatment”, Sydney, Australia, Health Communications 2000, pp. 1-56. [Part I].
WHO Technical Report Series 894, “Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic”, WHO Technical Report Series 894 (2000) pp. 1-253. [Part II].
Wigginton et al., “A note on exact tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium”, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76 (2005) pp. 887-893.
Wijsman, et al., “Multipoint linkage analysis with many multiallelic or dense diallelic markers: Markov chain-Monte Carlo provides practical approaches for genome scans on general pedigrees” Am. J. Hum. Genet. 79, (2006) pp. 846-858.
Wright, S. “Systems of Mating. I. The Biometric Relations Between Parent and Offspring,” Genetics, 6:111 (1921).
Yu, et al., “A unified mixed-model method for association mapping accounting for mutiple levels of relatedness” Nature Genet. 38, (2006) pp. 203-208.
Zhang, et al., “A comparison of several methods for haplotype frequency estimation and haplotype reconstruction for tightly linked markers from general pedigrees” Genet. Epidemiol. 30 (2006) pp. 423-437.
Zhao, Hongyu, and Feng Liang, “On Relationship Inference Using Gamete Identity by Descent Data,” Journal of Computational Biology, vol. 8, No. 2, 2001.
Zimprich A. et al., “Mutations in LRRK2 cause autosomal-autosomal-dominant parkinsonism with pleomorphic pathology”, Neuron 44 (2004) pp. 601-607.
Zou H. and Hastie T., “Regularization and variable selection via the Elastic Net”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 67 (2005), pp. 301-320.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/927,785, dated Feb. 10, 2020.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/999,198, dated Aug. 5, 2020.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/129,645, dated Apr. 23, 2021.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,721, dated Jan. 25, 2021.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,721, dated Oct. 26, 2021.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/814,243, dated Jul. 1, 2020.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/814,243, dated Nov. 16, 2020.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/814,243, dated Dec. 9, 2021.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/814,243, dated Jun. 22, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/004,494, dated Nov. 6, 2020.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/004,911, dated Nov. 18, 2020.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/073,122, dated Dec. 24, 2020.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/073,122, dated Jun. 14, 2021.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/073,128, dated Feb. 3, 2021.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/073,128, dated Jun. 30, 2021.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,930, dated Dec. 21, 2020.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,930, dated Apr. 20, 2021.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,930, dated Nov. 16, 2021.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/175,995, dated Oct. 19, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/212,596, dated Sep. 19, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/212,906, dated May 12, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/212,906, dated Jun. 24, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Aplp. No. 17/301,129, dated Jun. 8, 2021.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/351,052, dated Dec. 9, 2021.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/576,738, dated Apr. 14, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/584,844, dated Mar. 28, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/590,304, dated Apr. 4, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/729,840, dated Jun. 22, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/731,779, dated Jun. 16, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/731,963, dated Jun. 28, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/743,973, dated Jul. 14, 2022.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/958,665, dated Dec. 29, 2022.
Oliehoek, et al., “Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs” Genetics 173 (2006) pp. 483-496.
Olson, et al., “Relationship estimation by Markov-process models in sib-pair linkage study” Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64, (1999) pp. 1464-1472.
Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, filed in the United States District Court in and for the Northern District of California LLC on Jul. 13, 2018, Case No. 18-cv-02791-JCS, Re 23andMe, Inc. v. Ancestry.com DNA, LLC, Ancestry.com Operations Inc., and Ancestry.com.
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, dated Aug. 23, 2018, Case No. 18-cv-02791-JCS, from the United States District Court in and for the Northern District of California LLC, Re 23andMe, Inc. v. Ancestry.com DNA, LLC, Ancestry.com Operations Inc., and Ancestry.com.
Orlin J.B. and Lee Y., “QuickMatch: a very fast assignment for the assignment problem”, MIT Sloan School Working Paper, Mar. 1993, pp. 3547-3593.
Patterson, et al., “Population Structure and Eigenanalysis,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 2, No. 12, e190, Dec. 2006, pp. 2074-2093.
Payami H., et al., “Familial aggregation of Parkinson disease: a comparative study of early-onset and late-onset disease”, Arch Neurol. 59, (2002) pp. 848-850.
Paynter, et al., “Accuracy of Multiplexed Illumina Platform-Based Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotyping Compared between Genomic and Whole Genome Amplified DNA Collected from Multiple Sources,” Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 15, Dec. 2006, pp. 2533-2536.
Peedicayil, J., “Epigenetic Therapy—a New Development in Pharmacology”, Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 123, No. 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 17-24.
Pemberton et al., “Inference of unexpected Genetic relatedness among individuals in HapMap phase III” Am. J. Hum. Genet. 87, (2010) pp. 457-464.
Perry, et al., “The fine-scale and complex architecture of human copy-number variation,” Am. J. Hum. Genet. 82, Mar. 2008, pp. 685-695.
Pierpont et al., “Genetic basis for congenital heart defects: current knowledge: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee, Council on Cardiovascular disease in the Young: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics”, Circulation 115(23) (2007), pp. 3015-3038.
Pinto, et al., “Copy-number variation in control population cohorts,” Human Molecular Genetics, 2007, vol. 16, review issue No. 2, pp. R168-R173. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm241.
Polymeropoulos et al., “Mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson's disease”, Science 276 (1997), pp. 2045-2047.
Prather, et al., Medical data mining: knowledge discovery in a clinical data warehouse, Fall 1997, Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium, pp. 101-105.
Pritchard et al., “Linkage Disequilibrium in Humans: Models and Data”, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69 (2001), pp. 1-14.
Lander, et al., “hom*ozygosity mapping: a way to map human recessive traits with the DNA of inbred children” Science 236, (1987) pp. 1567-1570.
Lange, et al., “Extensions to pedigree analysis I. Likelihood calculations for simple and complex pedigrees” Hum. He red. 25 (1975) pp. 95-105.
Lavenier, Dominique, and J-L. Pacherie. “Parallel processing for scanning genomic databases.” Advances in Parallel Computing vol. 12, North-Holland, 1998, pp. 81-88.
Leclair, et al., “Enhanced kinship analysis and STR-based DNA typing for human identification in mass fatality incidents: The Swissair Flight 111 disaster” Journal of Forensic Sciences, 49(5) (2004) pp. 939-953.
Leibon, et al., “A simple computational method for the identification of disease-associated loci in complex, incomplete pedigrees” arXiv:0710:5625v1 [q-bio.GN] Oct. 30, 2007, pp. 1-20.
Leibon, Gregory, Daniel N. Rockmore, and Martin R Pollak, “A SNP streak model for the identification of genetic regions identical-by-descent”, Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 7, No. 1 (2008).
Leutenegger, et al., “Estimation of the Inbreeding Coefficient through Use of Genomic Data,” Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, Jul. 29, 2003, pp. 516-523.
Leutenegger, et al., “Using genomic inbreeding coefficient estimates for hom*ozygosity mapping of rare recessive traits: Application to Taybi-Linder syndrome” Am. J. Hum. Genet., vol. 79, Jul. 2006, pp. 62-66.
Li Y. et al., “Genetic evidence for ubiquitin-specific proteases USP24 and USP40 as candidate genes for late-onset Parkinson disease” Hum Mutat 27(10) (2006) pp. 1017-1023.
Li, et al., “Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform” Bioinformatics vol. 26, No. 5, 2010, pp. 589-595.
Li, et al., “Joint modeling of linkage and association: identifying SNPs responsible for a linkage signal” Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76 (2005) pp. 934-949.
Li, et al., “Mapping short DNA sequencing reads and calling variants using mapping quality scores,” Genome Research, Aug. 19, 2008, pp. 1851-1858. doi:10.1101/gr.078212.108.
Li, et al., “Modeling linkage disequilibrium and identifying recombination hotspots using single nucleotide polymorphism data” Genetics 165, (2003) pp. 2213-2233.
Li, et al., “Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness” Hum. Hered. 43, 1993 pp. 45-52.
Lien, et al. “Evidence for heterogeneity in recombination in the human pseudoautosomal region: High resolution analysis by sperm typing and radiation-hybrid mapping” Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 2000, pp. 557-566.
Lin, et al. “Haplotype inference in random population samples” Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71, 2002, pp. 1129-1137.
Lindstrom, J. et al., “The diabetes risk score: a practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk” Diabetes Care 26:3 (2003) pp. 725-731.
Liu, et al., “Affected sib-pair test in inbred populations” Ann. Hum. Genet. 68, (2004) pp. 606-619.
Lo et al., “Epidemiology and adverse cardiovascular risk profile of diagnosed polycystic ovary syndrome” J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 91 (2006) pp. 1357-1363.
Lobo, et al., “AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models” Global Ecology and Biogeography, (2007) pp. 1-7. <10.1111>

&
&

&

&

<10.1038>

&

&

&

10.1038>
10.1111>
Comparison and identification of attribute similarity based on genetic markers (2024)

FAQs

What is the measure of genetic similarity? ›

Identity by Descent (IBD): Identity by descent is useful for determining similarity between family members. IBD simply measures the amount of genetic material inherited by each offspring from each parent, and compares the two.

How is genetic similarity determined? ›

DNA hybridization can measure how similar the DNA of different species is — more similar DNA hybrids “melt” at higher temperatures.

What are the characteristics and attributes of an organism that genes determine? ›

The term "phenotype" refers to the observable physical properties of an organism; these include the organism's appearance, development, and behavior. An organism's phenotype is determined by its genotype, which is the set of genes the organism carries, as well as by environmental influences upon these genes.

How is DNA used as evidence for evolution apex? ›

Answer and Explanation:

DNA is used as evidence for evolution because it shows that all species have one common ancestor. The more closely related the two species are, the more similar their DNA is, indicating they evolved from a recent common ancestor.

What do genetic comparisons show? ›

Comparative genomics is a field of biological research in which researchers use a variety of tools to compare the complete genome sequences of different species. By carefully comparing characteristics that define various organisms, researchers can pinpoint regions of similarity and difference.

What is the theory of genetic similarity? ›

We present genetic similarity theory (GST), which incorporates the kin- selection theory of altruism under a more general principle. GST states that a gene ensures its own survival by acting so as to bring about the reproduction of any organism in which copies of itself are to be found.

Why is genetic similarity important? ›

Similarity between parents and offspring or among siblings may also indicate the influence of genetic effects. The importance of the shared rearing environment can be evaluated by assessing the similarity of adoptees and their adoptive parents.

What is similarity based gene prediction? ›

Closely-related organisms may have similar genes. In order to determine the functions of unknown genes, researchers may compare them to known genes in a closely- related species. This is the idea behind the similarity-based approach to gene prediction.

What is genetic attributes? ›

Parents pass on traits or characteristics, such as eye colour and blood type, to their children through their genes. Some health conditions and diseases can be passed on genetically too. Sometimes, one characteristic has many different forms. For example, blood type can be A, B, AB or O.

Are all mutations harmful? ›

Not all genetic mutations lead to genetic disorders. Some genetic mutations don't have any effect on your health and well-being. This is because the change in the DNA sequence doesn't change how your cell functions. Your body also has enzymes, which are a substance that creates chemical reactions in our body.

What three critical things must genes be able to do? ›

Chapter 6 The Genetic Material. It must be stable. It must be capable of being expressed when needed. It must be capable of accurate replication.

How do DNA similarities provide evidence for evolution? ›

hom*ologous structures provide evidence for common ancestry, while analogous structures show that similar selective pressures can produce similar adaptations (beneficial features). Similarities and differences among biological molecules (e.g., in the DNA sequence of genes) can be used to determine species' relatedness.

What limitations does DNA evidence have? ›

Environmental factors such as heat, sunlight, bacteria and mold can destroy DNA evidence. Identical twins share identical DNA. DNA from close relatives is more similar than DNA from unrelated persons. DNA cannot be used to determine WHEN the suspect was at the crime scene.

What are the cons of DNA profiling analysis? ›

It is a complicated and tedious process, at times giving results that are hard to interpret. Problems with data security in DNA fingerprinting also create problems for additional storage and privacy. DNA fingerprinting relies primarily on human accuracy.

What is the percent genetic similarity between siblings? ›

Theoretically you could be totally unrelated to your sister, or share the exact same DNA as your brother! But because we are talking about so much DNA and so many different possible combinations, the percentage usually comes out to about 50%.

What is genome similarity score? ›

The pairwise genome similarity score (GSS) values can define a distance matrix between a set of genomes, which can be turned into a distance dendrogram. Outgroups can be included in the comparison to place the root of the dendrogram.

How is genetic relatedness measured? ›

Measures of relatedness.

The number n of individuals in the pathway that link the parents to the common ancestor, including the parents themselves, is used as a power of 0.5, and the 0.5n terms are added over all pathways and common ancestors.

What are the measures of genetic test? ›

Three major types of genetic testing are available in laboratories: cytogenetic (to examine whole chromosomes), biochemical (to measure protein produced by genes), and molecular (to look for small DNA mutations).

Top Articles
Olympics closing ceremony latest: Paris Games close at Stade de France
Check out what sold, and for how much, in Ocala/Marion County
Cold War Brainpop Answers
Halo AU/Crossover Recommendations & Ideas Thread
Mileage To Walmart
Optum Primary Care - Winter Park Aloma
The Blind Showtimes Near Merchants Walk Cinemas
Jacob Chapel Live Stream
Lsn Nashville Tn
United Center Section 305
Valeriewhitebby Footjob
R Umineko
Lake Charles, LA Houses and Single Family Homes For Rent | realtor.com®
Paulette Goddard | American Actress, Modern Times, Charlie Chaplin
1v1 lol unblocked Game- Play Unblocked Game Online for Free!
Maya Mixon Portnoy
Krystal Murphy Below Deck Net Worth
Hotfixes: September 13, 2024
ZQuiet Review | My Wife and I Both Tried ZQuiet for Snoring
Ck3 Diplomatic Range
Four-Legged Friday: Meet Tuscaloosa's Adoptable All-Stars Cub & Pickle
Onderdelen | Onderdelen en services
Westgate Trailer Mountain Grove
Weather | Livingston Daily Voice
2012 Buick Lacrosse Serpentine Belt Diagram
Natasha Tillotson
Osrs Toby
855-392-7812
San Diego Cars And Trucks Craigslist
Ketchum Who's Gotta Catch Em All Crossword Clue
Look Who Got Busted New Braunfels
Power Outage Map National Grid
Star Wars Galaxy Of Heroes Forums
454 Cubic Inches To Litres
Waifu Fighter F95
Fx Channel On Optimum
Shiny Flower Belinda
Busty Bruce Lee
2010 Ford F-350 Super Duty XLT for sale - Wadena, MN - craigslist
iPhone reconditionné
City Of Irving Tx Jail In-Custody List
Depths Charm Calamity
QuiBids Review: Legit Penny Auction or a Scam? The Truth... - MoneyPantry
La Fitness North Wales Class Schedule
Ncaa Wrestling Bracket Challenge
Benson Downs Resident Portal
Walgreens Bunce Rd
What Does Wmt Contactless Mean
What Does the Bible Say About Christ In Me?
Car Hire in Romania from £4/day - Search for car rentals on KAYAK
Pamibaby Telegram
Baja Boats For Sale On Craigslist
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Margart Wisoky

Last Updated:

Views: 5421

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (58 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Margart Wisoky

Birthday: 1993-05-13

Address: 2113 Abernathy Knoll, New Tamerafurt, CT 66893-2169

Phone: +25815234346805

Job: Central Developer

Hobby: Machining, Pottery, Rafting, Cosplaying, Jogging, Taekwondo, Scouting

Introduction: My name is Margart Wisoky, I am a gorgeous, shiny, successful, beautiful, adventurous, excited, pleasant person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.